DeLay Criticized for 'Only Christianity' Remarks (washingtonpost.com) Oh Really?? I guess the rest of us infidels better burn in Hell. Or better yet, south-east Texas. Can we really allow this close-minded bigot to make decisions for our country?? His undying support for Israel has stepped up and he is even now at odds with the present administration...

excerpt:
"Ladies and gentlemen, Christianity offers the only viable, reasonable, definitive answer to the questions of 'Where did I come from?' 'Why am I here?' 'Where am I going?' 'Does life have any meaningful purpose?' " DeLay said. "Only Christianity offers a way to understand that physical and moral border. Only Christianity offers a comprehensive worldview that covers all areas of life and thought, every aspect of creation. Only Christianity offers a way to live in response to the realities that we find in this world -- only Christianity."

WOW...

Has bin Laden bin forgotten? Brendan O'Neill of Cursor delivers interesting commentary on the all but fading star power of the most dangerous man in the word...

Former RNC Chairman, in Role as Lobbyist, Urged Policy Change on Plant Emissions That Bush Later Took Peter Yost, AP

The plot thickens, which is no big surprise. The question here is whether Chimp's motives were lead by pal Dick, who along with the pResident, are both tapped into now Commerce Sec Don Evans fund raising schemes or whether he Really believes global warning is not real. CO2 to you too...

Krugman Strikes again... The New York Times

His subtle and build approach always slaps the administration. To even think that Chimp's crew even wants to make time for environmental ploicy is absurd. What we have here is deflection and slight of hand. They say that action will happen, when really they are doing absolutely nothing. Except a "war on terror..."

Cancer Risk Found in French Fries and Bread

And I thought meat was a problem...

The idea for this came from a recent Washington Post column by Howard Kurtz, check it out here

This is a running newsletter and discussion on George Bush's inept administration and policies. W and his GOP handlers stole the election and lost the popular vote, therefore cannot lead on a Mandate. This notion is simple and direct. A President is elected by the People, and leads with policies determined by the People. If that newly "elected" President wins solely based on the outdated Electoral College, which is not controlled directly by the People, then he does not deserve to direct his policies with a Mandate as directed by the People. Therefore, I have dedicated this site and ideas therein to the opposite understanding of our pResident's motivations. His actions are without the consent of the People- environmentally, politically, socially, and economically. We will explore these actions throughout his short term, and take action at a local level to promote balanced and understanding politicians to lead us... Let's do it.

Welcome to the antiMandate